Author:
Monday, March 22nd, 2010

Product Description
Providing a comprehensive overview, this text includes practical, clinically relevant coverage of complementary and alternative medicine, with commentary by well-known experts, descriptions of recent medical advances, case studies, and the history and philosophy of each discipline, along with indications, contraindications, practical application, and clinical trials for each topic. Research is critically reviewed, with examples of exceptional and flawed studies. You… More >>

Mosby’s Complementary & Alternative Medicine: A Research-Based Approach

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Responses

  1. This 532-page book is intended to help medical students obtain a comprehensive understanding of complementary and alternative medical therapies in modern medical practice. It discusses each discipline with a commendable amount of detail, covering the history, theories, and research underlying each field.

    The book’s main weakness, however, is that it is not rigorous enough in evaluating some of the disciplines it presents. For example, clinical research trials studying the efficacy of homeopathy are presented, but the authors failed to mention questions concerning the validity of such trials that were raised by the researchers’ peers; such challenges could have easily been compiled with a simple MEDLINE search. Even the “Benveniste affair” concerning the alleged “memory of water” is given a strictly one-sided treatment.

    This same weakness also hampers the unit dealing with Therapeutic Touch. Although the JAMA report is covered, it is the only argument presented in the book that questions the discipline, and the authors fail to adequately discuss the ongoing debates over the therapy’s claimed usefulness.

    MOSBY’S COMPLIMENTARY & ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE is a worthwhile introduction to alternative medical disciplines – but take it with a grain of salt.
    Rating: 3 / 5

  2. The book is steeped in hard science which is great, if you’ve recently had microbiology, anatomy and physiology I & II, and chemistry at minimum. Even then it is way too dense, has too many case studies and abstracts. Authors seemed to be looking for validation from their peers rather than to educate about alternative healing. Will sell it right after finals.
    Rating: 3 / 5

  3. I received the book in great condition. The book new was $30.00 less than what the book costed used at the college bookstore.

    A friend got me into getting my texbooks online and I have been very pleased with the results.
    Rating: 5 / 5

  4. 4
    Anonymous 

    I am a family doctor, and bought the book as a reference for my practice. I have attempted to refer to it several times, and am sad to say it had NO USEFUL clinical information I could use.

    The book is good for someone who wants a broad overview of all alternative medicine, but is of low utility for any specific or detailed information.

    Bottom line: do NOT waste your money buying it.
    Rating: 2 / 5

  5. 5
    Anonymous 

    The only thing lacking in objectivity is Mr. Barnett’s review. Anyone from an organization called “North Texas Skeptics”, isn’t looking at things from an unbiased viewpoint themselves. Ms. Freeman does an amazing job compiling information, often not taught and not available in allopathic medical circles, as to the history, approach and practice of the various complementary practices health practitioners need to know about. Her job in this text is not to fully critique all of the medical literature available on the subject, but there is plenty of reference material available and cited if one wishes to do that. The problems with the “skeptics” approach is that, if one does not choose to trash every system that they believe to be flawed (by western allopathic medical criteria), then THAT person is not objective. I think the above reviewer misses the point of this text entirely.
    Rating: 5 / 5

Leave a Reply